![]() ![]() It's not exactly 'marketing garbage' either, since the 386SX allowed you to run 32-bit software.ģ86SX basically was a 386-compatible CPU on a 286-ish motherboard (various later 286 chipsets can be used for both 286 and 386SX), giving you a 32-bit system at the price of a 16-bit one. ![]() It's marginally slower, I'd say it's the same speed most of the time. I know, Windows 3.1 is much better for older computers, but maybe i can use Windows 95 for running older Win3.1 software with true multitasking?ĭo you know some efficient and quick applications for win3.1/w95 that where used in the past for business, home office work and multi media?Īny image viewer, audio player, personal information manager for use on 386er cpus?īack in the days i run Windows 95 on a Pentium 90 machine, but I just want to know this cause of my interrest in classic computers. Showing some low res jpgs with acdsee is horrible slow and playing wav wont work with internal player.īut what can i do with Win95 on a 386CPU? Now i got 8MB of Ram and it feels much better cause of less HDD activity. The installation of Office 95 tooks about one hour but Word and Excel are running fine. Well, it is very sluggish cause of only 4MB Ram but it works. I had to tune DOS a little bit to get more memory for installer but finaly is works. I recently installed Windows 95 (first version) on a 386 DX-20 with 4MB of RAM for testing. ![]() In 1995 386 DX-16 CPUs are 10 Years old and even newer ones only go up to 33 Mhz (Intel) or 40 Mhz (AMD). I had a look at the System Requirements for Windows 95 and was wondering why it can be run on a 80386 DX CPU. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |